Written Design
| # | Team |
Cost Analysis
/ 50 |
Cost Strategy
/ 50 |
Criteria & Objectives
/ 5 |
Design Details
/ 270 |
Design Log
/ 20 |
Format
/ 15 |
Judges Discretion
/ 20 |
Testing & Development
/ 70 |
Total / 500 |
% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | University of Illinois A Team | 43.0 | 39.0 | 5.0 | 240.0 | 19.3 | 14.7 | 19.0 | 66.7 | 500.0 | 100% |
| 2 | University of Nebraska A Team | 40.3 | 38.7 | 5.0 | 235.0 | 20.0 | 14.0 | 18.3 | 67.7 | 492.3 | 98% |
| 3 | Kansas State University A Team | 41.3 | 42.0 | 5.0 | 223.3 | 17.0 | 13.7 | 17.0 | 68.3 | 481.0 | 96% |
| 4 | University of Saskatchewan A Team | 41.7 | 35.7 | 5.0 | 232.3 | 20.0 | 14.3 | 18.7 | 60.0 | 481.0 | 96% |
| 5 | Iowa State University A Team | 44.0 | 43.3 | 4.3 | 230.0 | 17.7 | 13.7 | 16.0 | 55.0 | 477.3 | 95% |
| 6 | University of Kentucky A Team | 41.7 | 35.3 | 4.0 | 226.7 | 17.7 | 12.3 | 16.0 | 65.0 | 472.0 | 94% |
| 7 | South Dakota State University A Team | 43.0 | 36.0 | 4.3 | 227.3 | 18.7 | 14.0 | 16.7 | 55.0 | 468.3 | 94% |
| 8 | Purdue A Team | 30.0 | 32.7 | 5.0 | 226.7 | 17.7 | 13.3 | 16.0 | 65.0 | 459.7 | 92% |
| 9 | North Carolina State University A Team | 37.0 | 32.3 | 4.7 | 210.0 | 20.0 | 15.0 | 15.0 | 61.7 | 449.0 | 90% |
| 10 | Université Laval A Team | 38.3 | 37.7 | 5.0 | 217.7 | 14.7 | 11.3 | 14.0 | 54.7 | 446.7 | 89% |
| 11 | Oklahoma State University A Team | 44.7 | 41.7 | 5.0 | 213.3 | 18.3 | 14.3 | 10.0 | 40.0 | 440.7 | 88% |
| 12 | North Dakota State University A Team | 34.7 | 34.3 | 5.0 | 225.0 | 16.0 | 14.0 | 15.0 | 41.7 | 439.0 | 88% |
| 13 | University of Missouri A Team | 36.0 | 32.7 | 4.7 | 216.7 | 14.0 | 12.7 | 14.7 | 50.0 | 434.7 | 87% |
| 14 | University of Manitoba A Team | 35.3 | 29.0 | 3.7 | 210.0 | 14.0 | 13.7 | 14.0 | 58.3 | 431.3 | 86% |
| 15 | University of Wisconsin-Madison A Team | 41.7 | 33.7 | 4.0 | 210.0 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 12.0 | 30.0 | 404.7 | 81% |
| 16 | Texas A&M University A Team | 24.7 | 30.3 | 4.0 | 200.7 | 17.3 | 13.7 | 16.3 | 43.3 | 403.7 | 81% |
| 17 | McGill University A Team | 27.7 | 34.3 | 4.3 | 188.3 | 11.7 | 12.3 | 12.0 | 50.0 | 394.0 | 79% |
| 18 | University of Tennessee Martin A Team | 29.3 | 20.3 | 5.0 | 186.7 | 16.3 | 9.3 | 11.0 | 23.0 | 354.3 | 71% |
| 19 | Institut de technologie A Team | 30.7 | 33.3 | 4.2 | 176.7 | 0.0 | 11.0 | 11.7 | 25.0 | 345.8 | 69% |
| 20 | Cal Poly State University A Team | 8.3 | 4.3 | 3.7 | 196.7 | 11.0 | 12.0 | 15.0 | 39.0 | 343.3 | 69% |
| 21 | University of Wisconsin - River Falls A Team | 30.7 | 31.3 | 3.8 | 158.3 | 18.3 | 11.7 | 9.3 | 26.0 | 342.8 | 69% |
| 22 | University of Guelph A Team | 27.0 | 27.0 | 4.7 | 153.3 | 8.3 | 11.3 | 8.0 | 35.0 | 328.0 | 66% |
| 23 | University of Georgia A Team | 32.7 | 26.7 | 3.0 | 144.0 | 6.7 | 10.0 | 10.3 | 19.7 | 306.3 | 61% |
| 24 | Iowa State University X X Team | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | South Dakota State University X X Team | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | University of Kentucky X X Team | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | University of Missouri X X Team | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | University of Nebraska X X Team | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | Penn State University X X Team | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | University of Guelph X X Team | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | Penn State University A Team | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0% |
| 32 | North Dakota State University X X Team | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | University of Wisconsin-Platteville A Team | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |